rs75124018

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001099274.3(TINF2):​c.771C>T​(p.His257=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00133 in 1,613,880 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0014 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TINF2
NM_001099274.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.370
Variant links:
Genes affected
TINF2 (HGNC:11824): (TERF1 interacting nuclear factor 2) This gene encodes one of the proteins of the shelterin, or telosome, complex which protects telomeres by allowing the cell to distinguish between telomeres and regions of DNA damage. The protein encoded by this gene is a critical part of shelterin; it interacts with the three DNA-binding proteins of the shelterin complex, and it is important for assembly of the complex. Mutations in this gene cause dyskeratosis congenita (DKC), an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.64).
BP6
Variant 14-24240709-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-24240709-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 312949.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-24240709-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.37 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00102 (155/152302) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0015 (102/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00126. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 89 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 155 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TINF2NM_001099274.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.771C>T p.His257= synonymous_variant 6/9 ENST00000267415.12 NP_001092744.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TINF2ENST00000267415.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.771C>T p.His257= synonymous_variant 6/91 NM_001099274.3 ENSP00000267415 P1Q9BSI4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00102
AC:
155
AN:
152184
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000266
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000479
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000904
AC:
225
AN:
248854
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000859
AC XY:
116
AN XY:
135022
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000194
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000203
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00302
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00128
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000661
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00136
AC:
1995
AN:
1461578
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00135
AC XY:
980
AN XY:
727088
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000180
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000202
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000128
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00277
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00158
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00109
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00102
AC:
155
AN:
152302
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00120
AC XY:
89
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00150
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000474
Alfa
AF:
0.00110
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000657
EpiCase
AF:
0.000927
EpiControl
AF:
0.000948

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Jul 14, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 12, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 18, 2024- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJul 21, 2021- -
Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Revesz syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
TINF2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 02, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
CADD
Benign
5.5
DANN
Benign
0.83

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs75124018; hg19: chr14-24709915; API