rs765026950

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PM2PP3_ModeratePP5

The NM_017777.4(MKS1):c.371G>A(p.Arg124Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000867 in 1,614,010 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0000089 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

MKS1
NM_017777.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.26

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

MKS1 (HGNC:7121): (MKS transition zone complex subunit 1) The protein encoded by this gene localizes to the basal body and is required for formation of the primary cilium in ciliated epithelial cells. Mutations in this gene result in Meckel syndrome type 1 and in Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 13. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

MKS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ciliopathy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
Meckel syndrome, type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
Bardet-Biedl syndrome 13
Inheritance: Unknown, AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
Joubert syndrome 28
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Joubert syndrome with ocular defect
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Meckel syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

MKS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

PP3

MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.844

PP5

Variant 17-58216134-C-T is Pathogenic according to our data. Variant chr17-58216134-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 530895.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_017777.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
MKS1	NM_017777.4	MANE Select	c.371G>A	p.Arg124Gln	missense	Exon 4 of 18	NP_060247.2	Q9NXB0-1
MKS1	NM_001321269.2		c.371G>A	p.Arg124Gln	missense	Exon 4 of 17	NP_001308198.1	A0A7I2V2M0
MKS1	NM_001330397.2		c.371G>A	p.Arg124Gln	missense	Exon 4 of 16	NP_001317326.1	H0Y2S2

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
MKS1	ENST00000393119.7	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.371G>A	p.Arg124Gln	missense	Exon 4 of 18	ENSP00000376827.2	Q9NXB0-1
MKS1	ENST00000537529.7	TSL:1	c.-59G>A		5_prime_UTR	Exon 4 of 18	ENSP00000442096.3	A0A0S2Z5Z2
MKS1	ENST00000966002.1		c.371G>A	p.Arg124Gln	missense	Exon 4 of 18	ENSP00000636061.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00000401

AC:

AN:

249586

AF XY:

0.00

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000883

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00000889

AC:

AN:

1461876

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000688

AC XY:

AN XY:

727244

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86254

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53412

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000117

AC:

AN:

1112006

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152134

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74342

show subpopulations

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41418

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15268

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000147

AC:

AN:

68020

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.275

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000712

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ExAC

AF:

0.00000828

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Revision:criteria provided, conflicting classifications

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

not provided (2)

Inborn genetic diseases (1)

Meckel syndrome, type 1 (1)

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C5979921:Joubert syndrome (1)

MKS1-related disorder (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Uncertain

0.41

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.31

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.21

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Pathogenic

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.50

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.86

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.85

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.98

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.14

MetaRNN

Pathogenic

0.84

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.15

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.5

PhyloP100

7.3

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.52

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.7

REVEL

Uncertain

0.30

Sift

Uncertain

0.0060

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

Polyphen

1.0

Vest4

0.91

MutPred

0.44

Loss of MoRF binding (P = 0.0214)

MVP

0.83

MPC

0.96

ClinPred

0.99

GERP RS

5.8

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.37

gMVP

0.68

Mutation Taster

=211/89

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over