rs777050237
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_176890.2(TAS2R50):c.815T>C(p.Leu272Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000322 in 1,613,928 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L272I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_176890.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_176890.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAS2R50 | TSL:6 MANE Select | c.815T>C | p.Leu272Pro | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000424040.1 | P59544 | ||
| ENSG00000275778 | TSL:5 | n.110-12325T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000482961.1 | A0A087WZY1 | |||
| PRH1 | c.-125-12325T>C | intron | N/A | ENSP00000515364.1 | A0A087WYT0 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000557 AC: 14AN: 251194 AF XY: 0.0000663 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 48AN: 1461810Hom.: 0 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.0000385 AC XY: 28AN XY: 727200 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152118Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74312 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at