rs786203961
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2_Supporting
The NM_001042492.3(NF1):āc.5793T>Cā(p.Ile1931=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000515 in 1,612,726 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.000053 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous
NM_001042492.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.40
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.46).
BP6
Variant 17-31330479-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31330479-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 187736.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.4 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 5 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NF1 | NM_001042492.3 | c.5793T>C | p.Ile1931= | synonymous_variant | 39/58 | ENST00000358273.9 | NP_001035957.1 | |
NF1 | NM_000267.3 | c.5730T>C | p.Ile1910= | synonymous_variant | 38/57 | NP_000258.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NF1 | ENST00000358273.9 | c.5793T>C | p.Ile1931= | synonymous_variant | 39/58 | 1 | NM_001042492.3 | ENSP00000351015 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152248
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 251072Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135678
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
251072
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135678
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000534 AC: 78AN: 1460478Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000399 AC XY: 29AN XY: 726610
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
78
AN:
1460478
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
726610
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000328 AC: 5AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74386
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5
AN:
152248
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74386
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Medical Genetics, University of Parma | Aug 17, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Mar 15, 2022 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 17, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Dec 30, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 20, 2023 | Variant summary: NF1 c.5730T>C alters a conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. One computational tool predicts the variant may affect splicing. However, this prediction has yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.4e-05 in 251072 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.5730T>C has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer. These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Neurofibromatosis Type 1. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Five clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
NF1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 08, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 29, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at