rs78667015

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_145649.5(GCNT2):​c.1018+15C>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000357 in 1,541,272 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000033 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000036 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GCNT2
NM_145649.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.293

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GCNT2 (HGNC:4204): (glucosaminyl (N-acetyl) transferase 2 (I blood group)) This gene encodes the enzyme responsible for formation of the blood group I antigen. The i and I antigens are distinguished by linear and branched poly-N-acetyllactosaminoglycans, respectively. The encoded protein is the I-branching enzyme, a beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase responsible for the conversion of fetal i antigen to adult I antigen in erythrocytes during embryonic development. Mutations in this gene have been associated with adult i blood group phenotype. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
GCNT2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • cataract 13 with adult I phenotype
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • total early-onset cataract
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 6-10621458-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-10621458-C-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 258156.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GCNT2NM_145649.5 linkc.1018+15C>G intron_variant Intron 4 of 4 ENST00000495262.7 NP_663624.1 Q8N0V5-1
GCNT2NM_001491.3 linkc.1012+15C>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 2 ENST00000316170.9 NP_001482.1 Q8N0V5-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GCNT2ENST00000495262.7 linkc.1018+15C>G intron_variant Intron 4 of 4 2 NM_145649.5 ENSP00000419411.2 Q8N0V5-1
GCNT2ENST00000316170.9 linkc.1012+15C>G intron_variant Intron 2 of 2 1 NM_001491.3 ENSP00000314844.3 Q8N0V5-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000329
AC:
5
AN:
152170
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000965
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000141
AC:
35
AN:
247644
AF XY:
0.000112
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000360
AC:
50
AN:
1388984
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.0000317
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
694880
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
32164
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44472
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
25614
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00114
AC:
45
AN:
39314
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
84566
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53282
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5612
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000382
AC:
4
AN:
1046028
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000173
AC:
1
AN:
57932
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.475
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
7
11
14
18
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000328
AC:
5
AN:
152288
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74460
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000967
AC:
5
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.535
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000567

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Blood group, I system Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
1.9
DANN
Benign
0.55
PhyloP100
0.29

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs78667015; hg19: chr6-10621691; API