rs80358685

chr13-32338890-G-Achr13-32338890-G-Cchr13-32338890-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.4535G>A(p.Arg1512His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000124 in 1,613,782 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1512C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0000066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:4O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.371

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.068300635).

BP6

Variant 13-32338890-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32338890-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 51661.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Likely_benign=4, not_provided=1}. Variant chr13-32338890-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.4535G>A	p.Arg1512His	missense_variant	11/27	ENST00000380152.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.4535G>A	p.Arg1512His	missense_variant	11/27	5	NM_000059.4	A2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000399

AC:

AN:

250334

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00000738

AC XY:

AN XY:

135588

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000130

AC:

AN:

1461662

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000124

AC XY:

AN XY:

727120

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000504

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000144

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00000657

AC:

AN:

152120

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

74324

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:4Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Other:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	GeneDx	Feb 14, 2023	Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Absent from cases but present in controls in a breast cancer case-control study (Momozawa et al., 2018); Also known as 4763G>A; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31131967, 34736091, 27149842, 25348012, 25266736, 30287823) -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano	May 11, 2018	- -
not provided, no classification provided	phenotyping only	GenomeConnect, ClinGen	-	GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	University of Washington Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington	Mar 23, 2023	Missense variant in a coldspot region where missense variants are very unlikely to be pathogenic (PMID:31911673). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Oct 30, 2023	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Dec 29, 2015	- -

Medulloblastoma;C0346153:Familial cancer of breast;C0376358:Malignant tumor of prostate;C1838457:Fanconi anemia complementation group D1;C2675520:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2;C2751641:Glioma susceptibility 3;C3150546:Pancreatic cancer, susceptibility to, 2;CN033288:Wilms tumor 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Oct 31, 2018

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Oct 15, 2018

Variant summary: BRCA2 c.4535G>A (p.Arg1512His) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 7.5e-06 in 267704 control chromosomes (gnomAD and publication). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.4535G>A has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with cancer (Chmielecki_2014, Giannakis_2016). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (BRCA2 c.5576_5579delTTAA, p.I1859fsX3), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Three ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Breast Cancer Information Core (BIC) (BRCA2)

May 29, 2002

- -

Malignant tumor of breast

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

The p.Arg1512His variant has been identified in individuals with breast and ovarian cancer; however no control chromosomes were included in these studies (Sanz 2010, Lindor 2011, Michal et al.). It is listed in the dbSNP database as coming from a â€šÃ„Ãºclinical sourceâ€šÃ„Ã¹ (ID#:rs80358685) however no frequency information was provided. This residue is not highly conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen2, SIFT, AlignGVGD) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. Other variants impacting the same amino acid position (p.Arg1512Cys (2X) and p.Arg1512Pro (1X)) have been presented in the BIC database as having unknown clinical significance. In summary, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. Therefore this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance (VUS). -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Invitae

Dec 12, 2023

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.081

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.33

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

Cadd

Benign

0.54

Dann

Benign

0.23

Eigen

Benign

-1.1

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.1

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.052

M_CAP

Benign

0.034

MetaRNN

Benign

0.068

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.93

MutationTaster

Benign

1.0

N;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.19

PROVEAN

Benign

0.050

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.074

Sift

Benign

0.55

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.55

T;T

Vest4

0.22

MutPred

0.29

Loss of catalytic residue at R1512 (P = 0.0751);Loss of catalytic residue at R1512 (P = 0.0751);

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.031

ClinPred

0.020

GERP RS

0.40

gMVP

0.15

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over