1-10371271-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001365951.3(KIF1B):​c.4946+9C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0267 in 1,613,834 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 781 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.036 ( 116 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.026 ( 665 hom. )

Consequence

KIF1B
NM_001365951.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.00900

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
KIF1B (HGNC:16636): (kinesin family member 1B) Predicted to enable microtubule binding activity and plus-end-directed microtubule motor activity. Predicted to be involved in chemical synaptic transmission; dense core granule cytoskeletal transport; and vesicle-mediated transport. Predicted to act upstream of or within mitochondrion transport along microtubule. Predicted to be located in cytoplasmic vesicle membrane and neuron projection. Predicted to be part of kinesin complex. Predicted to be active in several cellular components, including axon; dendrite; and microtubule. Implicated in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A1; carcinoma (multiple); multiple sclerosis; neuroblastoma; and pheochromocytoma. Biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma. [provided by Alliance of Genome Resources, Apr 2022]
KIF1B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • pheochromocytoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2A1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED, NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • neuroblastoma, susceptibility to, 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).
BP6
Variant 1-10371271-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-10371271-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 291583.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0753 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KIF1BNM_001365951.3 linkc.4946+9C>T intron_variant Intron 45 of 48 ENST00000676179.1 NP_001352880.1
KIF1BNM_001365952.1 linkc.4946+9C>T intron_variant Intron 45 of 48 NP_001352881.1
KIF1BNM_015074.3 linkc.4808+9C>T intron_variant Intron 43 of 46 NP_055889.2 O60333-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KIF1BENST00000676179.1 linkc.4946+9C>T intron_variant Intron 45 of 48 NM_001365951.3 ENSP00000502065.1 O60333-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0355
AC:
5402
AN:
152118
Hom.:
114
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0481
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0428
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0323
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0521
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0811
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0267
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0502
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0219
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0407
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0335
AC:
8417
AN:
251330
AF XY:
0.0324
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0495
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0294
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0466
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0823
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0464
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0232
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0375
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0257
AC:
37634
AN:
1461598
Hom.:
665
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0257
AC XY:
18658
AN XY:
727128
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0505
AC:
1690
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0306
AC:
1366
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0466
AC:
1217
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0884
AC:
3510
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0258
AC:
2229
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0464
AC:
2477
AN:
53404
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0832
AC:
479
AN:
5760
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0203
AC:
22599
AN:
1111802
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0342
AC:
2067
AN:
60386
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.466
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1872
3743
5615
7486
9358
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
914
1828
2742
3656
4570
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0355
AC:
5408
AN:
152236
Hom.:
116
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0364
AC XY:
2711
AN XY:
74424
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0480
AC:
1995
AN:
41544
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0322
AC:
493
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0521
AC:
181
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0817
AC:
422
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0267
AC:
129
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0502
AC:
532
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.126
AC:
37
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0219
AC:
1492
AN:
68018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0417
AC:
88
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
270
540
810
1080
1350
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
58
116
174
232
290
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0296
Hom.:
35
Bravo
AF:
0.0358
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0630
AC:
220
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jul 28, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
-
Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neuroblastoma Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.80
CADD
Benign
8.3
DANN
Benign
0.55
PhyloP100
0.0090
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72867431; hg19: chr1-10431329; COSMIC: COSV55809283; COSMIC: COSV55809283; API