1-1041583-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_198576.4(AGRN):āc.1058A>Gā(p.Gln353Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00304 in 1,606,080 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 102 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_198576.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRN | NM_198576.4 | c.1058A>G | p.Gln353Arg | missense_variant | 6/36 | ENST00000379370.7 | NP_940978.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGRN | ENST00000379370.7 | c.1058A>G | p.Gln353Arg | missense_variant | 6/36 | 1 | NM_198576.4 | ENSP00000368678.2 | ||
AGRN | ENST00000651234.1 | c.743A>G | p.Gln248Arg | missense_variant | 5/38 | ENSP00000499046.1 | ||||
AGRN | ENST00000652369.1 | c.743A>G | p.Gln248Arg | missense_variant | 5/35 | ENSP00000498543.1 | ||||
AGRN | ENST00000620552.4 | c.644A>G | p.Gln215Arg | missense_variant | 6/39 | 5 | ENSP00000484607.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0155 AC: 2343AN: 151214Hom.: 47 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00386 AC: 916AN: 237174Hom.: 21 AF XY: 0.00294 AC XY: 385AN XY: 130756
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00174 AC: 2529AN: 1454750Hom.: 55 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00150 AC XY: 1089AN XY: 723978
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0155 AC: 2346AN: 151330Hom.: 47 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0153 AC XY: 1133AN XY: 73986
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 10, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 19, 2019 | - - |
AGRN-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 29, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Congenital myasthenic syndrome 8 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at