1-109269470-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_001408.3(CELSR2):c.6859G>C(p.Val2287Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000341 in 1,613,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V2287I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001408.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELSR2 | NM_001408.3 | c.6859G>C | p.Val2287Leu | missense_variant | Exon 21 of 34 | ENST00000271332.4 | NP_001399.1 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELSR2 | ENST00000271332.4 | c.6859G>C | p.Val2287Leu | missense_variant | Exon 21 of 34 | 1 | NM_001408.3 | ENSP00000271332.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000637 AC: 16AN: 251248 AF XY: 0.0000368 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000171 AC: 25AN: 1461772Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 727208 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000197 AC: 30AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000215 AC XY: 16AN XY: 74330 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at