1-111449840-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001688.5(ATP5PB):c.44C>T(p.Pro15Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000805 in 1,614,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P15S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001688.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001688.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP5PB | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.44C>T | p.Pro15Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 7 | ENSP00000358737.3 | P24539 | ||
| ATP5PB | c.44C>T | p.Pro15Leu | missense | Exon 2 of 7 | ENSP00000532299.1 | ||||
| ATP5PB | c.44C>T | p.Pro15Leu | missense | Exon 3 of 8 | ENSP00000532297.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251476 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000752 AC: 11AN: 1461882Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000688 AC XY: 5AN XY: 727246 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74336 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at