1-111776137-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 2P and 7B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBP7
The NM_001378969.1(KCND3):c.1908A>G(p.Pro636Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001378969.1 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neurodevelopmental disorderInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- spinocerebellar ataxia type 19/22Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
- Brugada syndrome 9Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- Brugada syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCND3 | NM_001378969.1 | c.1908A>G | p.Pro636Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 8 of 8 | ENST00000302127.5 | NP_001365898.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCND3 | ENST00000302127.5 | c.1908A>G | p.Pro636Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 8 of 8 | 5 | NM_001378969.1 | ENSP00000306923.4 | ||
KCND3 | ENST00000315987.6 | c.1908A>G | p.Pro636Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 8 of 8 | 1 | ENSP00000319591.2 | |||
KCND3 | ENST00000369697.5 | c.1851A>G | p.Pro617Pro | synonymous_variant | Exon 6 of 6 | 1 | ENSP00000358711.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at