1-114713907-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points: 9P and 0B. PS1_ModeratePM1PM2PM5PP3
The NM_002524.5(NRAS):c.183A>C(p.Gln61His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely pathogenicin ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q61K) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_002524.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRAS | NM_002524.5 | c.183A>C | p.Gln61His | missense_variant | 3/7 | ENST00000369535.5 | NP_002515.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRAS | ENST00000369535.5 | c.183A>C | p.Gln61His | missense_variant | 3/7 | 1 | NM_002524.5 | ENSP00000358548.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Melanoma Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Database of Curated Mutations (DoCM) | Jul 14, 2015 | - - |
Non-small cell lung carcinoma Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Database of Curated Mutations (DoCM) | Oct 02, 2014 | - - |
Acute myeloid leukemia Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Database of Curated Mutations (DoCM) | Oct 02, 2014 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at