1-11970702-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000302.4(PLOD1):​c.1788G>T​(p.Val596Val) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00725 in 1,613,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 210 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.020 ( 86 hom., cov: 27)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0059 ( 124 hom. )

Consequence

PLOD1
NM_000302.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.111

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PLOD1 (HGNC:9081): (procollagen-lysine,2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1) Lysyl hydroxylase is a membrane-bound homodimeric protein localized to the cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum. The enzyme (cofactors iron and ascorbate) catalyzes the hydroxylation of lysyl residues in collagen-like peptides. The resultant hydroxylysyl groups are attachment sites for carbohydrates in collagen and thus are critical for the stability of intermolecular crosslinks. Some patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VI have deficiencies in lysyl hydroxylase activity. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
PLOD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.47).
BP6
Variant 1-11970702-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-11970702-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 263892.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.111 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0596 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PLOD1NM_000302.4 linkc.1788G>T p.Val596Val synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 19 ENST00000196061.5 NP_000293.2
PLOD1NM_001316320.2 linkc.1929G>T p.Val643Val synonymous_variant Exon 18 of 20 NP_001303249.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PLOD1ENST00000196061.5 linkc.1788G>T p.Val596Val synonymous_variant Exon 17 of 19 1 NM_000302.4 ENSP00000196061.4
PLOD1ENST00000491536.5 linkn.383+3611G>T intron_variant Intron 4 of 4 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0204
AC:
3096
AN:
151474
Hom.:
86
Cov.:
27
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0616
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00967
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000198
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0181
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000568
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00419
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0149
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00937
AC:
2352
AN:
250972
AF XY:
0.00867
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0655
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00682
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000298
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000218
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000416
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00369
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00702
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00588
AC:
8590
AN:
1461528
Hom.:
124
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00601
AC XY:
4371
AN XY:
727068
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0653
AC:
2186
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00711
AC:
318
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000230
AC:
6
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000101
AC:
4
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0172
AC:
1485
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000640
AC:
34
AN:
53102
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0203
AC:
117
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00352
AC:
3913
AN:
1111980
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00873
AC:
527
AN:
60388
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.472
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
515
1030
1546
2061
2576
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
198
396
594
792
990
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0205
AC:
3101
AN:
151594
Hom.:
86
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.0193
AC XY:
1430
AN XY:
74016
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0616
AC:
2542
AN:
41254
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00959
AC:
146
AN:
15222
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000198
AC:
1
AN:
5040
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0183
AC:
88
AN:
4796
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000568
AC:
6
AN:
10558
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00680
AC:
2
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00419
AC:
285
AN:
67946
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0147
AC:
31
AN:
2102
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
142
285
427
570
712
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
34
68
102
136
170
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0108
Hom.:
25
Bravo
AF:
0.0232
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00895
AC:
31
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00469
EpiControl
AF:
0.00462

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Nov 17, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1 Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 28, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Feb 03, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Jul 09, 2022
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.47
CADD
Benign
2.4
DANN
Benign
0.57
PhyloP100
0.11
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs35460537; hg19: chr1-12030759; API