1-119922741-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_024408.4(NOTCH2):​c.4897G>A​(p.Val1633Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000834 in 1,614,184 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00084 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

NOTCH2
NM_024408.4 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.804

Publications

11 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NOTCH2 (HGNC:7882): (notch receptor 2) This gene encodes a member of the Notch family. Members of this Type 1 transmembrane protein family share structural characteristics including an extracellular domain consisting of multiple epidermal growth factor-like (EGF) repeats, and an intracellular domain consisting of multiple, different domain types. Notch family members play a role in a variety of developmental processes by controlling cell fate decisions. The Notch signaling network is an evolutionarily conserved intercellular signaling pathway which regulates interactions between physically adjacent cells. In Drosophilia, notch interaction with its cell-bound ligands (delta, serrate) establishes an intercellular signaling pathway that plays a key role in development. Homologues of the notch-ligands have also been identified in human, but precise interactions between these ligands and the human notch homologues remain to be determined. This protein is cleaved in the trans-Golgi network, and presented on the cell surface as a heterodimer. This protein functions as a receptor for membrane bound ligands, and may play a role in vascular, renal and hepatic development. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]
NOTCH2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • acroosteolysis dominant type
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Alagille syndrome due to a NOTCH2 point mutation
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • Alagille syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.025216103).
BP6
Variant 1-119922741-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-119922741-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 283843.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000808 (123/152300) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00135 (92/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00113. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 57 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 123 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NOTCH2NM_024408.4 linkc.4897G>A p.Val1633Ile missense_variant Exon 27 of 34 ENST00000256646.7 NP_077719.2 Q04721Q6IQ50Q9UFD5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NOTCH2ENST00000256646.7 linkc.4897G>A p.Val1633Ile missense_variant Exon 27 of 34 1 NM_024408.4 ENSP00000256646.2 Q04721
NOTCH2ENST00000493703.1 linkn.307G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 2 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000808
AC:
123
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00135
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000569
AC:
143
AN:
251466
AF XY:
0.000618
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000376
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00106
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000651
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000837
AC:
1224
AN:
1461884
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000809
AC XY:
588
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000149
AC:
5
AN:
33478
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000380
AC:
17
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000749
AC:
4
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00104
AC:
1158
AN:
1112010
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000629
AC:
38
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.471
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
70
140
210
280
350
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
38
76
114
152
190
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000808
AC:
123
AN:
152300
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000765
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000217
AC:
9
AN:
41562
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00131
AC:
20
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
1
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00135
AC:
92
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.489
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
12
17
23
29
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000983
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000763
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00108
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00104
AC:
4
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00128
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
0.000436
AC:
53
EpiCase
AF:
0.000818
EpiControl
AF:
0.000830

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Sep 24, 2019
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in an individual with primary open-angle glaucoma (Jakobsson et al., 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25902091) -

Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

NOTCH2: BP4, BS1 -

not specified Benign:2
May 30, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 16, 2025
Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hajdu-Cheney syndrome Benign:1
Jan 08, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

NOTCH2-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 06, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.071
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.52
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.53
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.30
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.15
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.61
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.79
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0044
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.025
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L
PhyloP100
0.80
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.28
N
REVEL
Benign
0.084
Sift
Benign
0.29
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.45
T
Polyphen
0.27
B
Vest4
0.091
MVP
0.36
MPC
0.46
ClinPred
0.035
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.18
Mutation Taster
=75/25
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs116321057; hg19: chr1-120465364; API