1-119966426-T-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_024408.4(NOTCH2):c.1517A>C(p.Asn506Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N506S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024408.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- acroosteolysis dominant typeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Alagille syndrome due to a NOTCH2 point mutationInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: G2P, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Alagille syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Illumina
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOTCH2 | ENST00000256646.7 | c.1517A>C | p.Asn506Thr | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 34 | 1 | NM_024408.4 | ENSP00000256646.2 | ||
NOTCH2 | ENST00000479412.2 | n.1655A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 8 of 14 | 1 | |||||
NOTCH2 | ENST00000640021.1 | n.*641A>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 6 of 12 | 5 | ENSP00000492223.1 | ||||
NOTCH2 | ENST00000640021.1 | n.*641A>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant | Exon 6 of 12 | 5 | ENSP00000492223.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251288 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 31
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at