1-1427599-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_001146685.2(TMEM278):c.304C>G(p.Arg102Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000851 in 1,175,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R102C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001146685.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001146685.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMEM278 | NM_001146685.2 | MANE Select | c.304C>G | p.Arg102Gly | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | NP_001140157.1 | A6NKF7 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMEM88B | ENST00000378821.4 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.304C>G | p.Arg102Gly | missense | Exon 2 of 2 | ENSP00000455099.1 | A6NKF7 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 14
GnomAD4 exome AF: 8.51e-7 AC: 1AN: 1175006Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00000175 AC XY: 1AN XY: 572684 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 14
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at