1-147908759-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_005267.5(GJA8):c.804C>T(p.Leu268=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0423 in 1,614,040 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,643 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.047 ( 206 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.042 ( 1437 hom. )
Consequence
GJA8
NM_005267.5 synonymous
NM_005267.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.442
Genes affected
GJA8 (HGNC:4281): (gap junction protein alpha 8) This gene encodes a transmembrane connexin protein that is necessary for lens growth and maturation of lens fiber cells. The encoded protein is a component of gap junction channels and functions in a calcium and pH-dependent manner. Mutations in this gene have been associated with zonular pulverulent cataracts, nuclear progressive cataracts, and cataract-microcornea syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 1-147908759-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-147908759-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 259707.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-147908759-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.442 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0689 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA8 | NM_005267.5 | c.804C>T | p.Leu268= | synonymous_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000369235.2 | NP_005258.2 | |
GJA8 | XM_011509417.3 | c.804C>T | p.Leu268= | synonymous_variant | 1/2 | XP_011507719.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA8 | ENST00000369235.2 | c.804C>T | p.Leu268= | synonymous_variant | 2/2 | NM_005267.5 | ENSP00000358238 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0471 AC: 7171AN: 152136Hom.: 204 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
7171
AN:
152136
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0403 AC: 10130AN: 251406Hom.: 272 AF XY: 0.0410 AC XY: 5568AN XY: 135910
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
10130
AN:
251406
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
5568
AN XY:
135910
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0418 AC: 61056AN: 1461786Hom.: 1437 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.0422 AC XY: 30699AN XY: 727202
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
61056
AN:
1461786
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
30699
AN XY:
727202
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0472 AC: 7181AN: 152254Hom.: 206 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0479 AC XY: 3566AN XY: 74442
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7181
AN:
152254
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3566
AN XY:
74442
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
329
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 31, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cataract 1 multiple types Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 16, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Zonular Pulverulent Cataract Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at