1-150487451-A-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PVS1_SupportingPM2
The NM_025150.5(TARS2):c.1A>T(p.Met1?) variant causes a initiator codon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,461,890 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_025150.5 initiator_codon
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- combined oxidative phosphorylation defect type 21Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- Leigh syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251460 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 4AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727244 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies and prediction algorithms are not available or were not evaluated, and the functional significance of this variant is currently unknown. This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TARS2-related conditions. This variant is present in population databases (no rsID available, gnomAD 0.0009%). This sequence change affects the initiator methionine of the TARS2 mRNA. The next in-frame methionine is located at codon 53. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at