1-150796836-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points: 14P and 0B. PM1PP3_StrongPP5_Very_Strong
The NM_000396.4(CTSK):c.953G>A(p.Cys318Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000018 in 1,614,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000396.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- pycnodysostosisInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, ClinGen, G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 14 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000396.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTSK | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.953G>A | p.Cys318Tyr | missense | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000271651.3 | P43235 | ||
| CTSK | TSL:3 | c.1130G>A | p.Cys377Tyr | missense | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000405083.2 | Q5QP40 | ||
| CTSK | c.995G>A | p.Cys332Tyr | missense | Exon 9 of 9 | ENSP00000503876.1 | A0A7I2V4B6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152198Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251474 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000116 AC: 17AN: 1461876Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000963 AC XY: 7AN XY: 727242 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152316Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000671 AC XY: 5AN XY: 74480 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at