1-150966203-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_022075.5(CERS2):c.1088G>A(p.Arg363Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000685 in 1,606,734 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R363W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_022075.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_022075.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CERS2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1088G>A | p.Arg363Gln | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000357950.5 | Q96G23 | ||
| CERS2 | TSL:1 | c.629G>A | p.Arg210Gln | missense | Exon 6 of 6 | ENSP00000453297.2 | H0YLQ6 | ||
| CERS2 | c.1127G>A | p.Arg376Gln | missense | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000625143.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152066Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000827 AC: 2AN: 241784 AF XY: 0.0000152 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000619 AC: 9AN: 1454668Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000276 AC XY: 2AN XY: 723864 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000132 AC: 2AN: 152066Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74282 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at