1-15112518-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_201628.3(KAZN):c.2140G>T(p.Gly714Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000307 in 1,604,986 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G714S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_201628.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_201628.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KAZN | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.2140G>T | p.Gly714Cys | missense | Exon 14 of 15 | ENSP00000365198.2 | Q674X7-1 | ||
| TMEM51-AS1 | TSL:1 | n.6270C>A | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 5 of 5 | |||||
| KAZN | TSL:5 | c.2404G>T | p.Gly802Cys | missense | Exon 16 of 17 | ENSP00000490958.1 | A0A1B0GWK2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000253 AC: 38AN: 150066Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000178 AC: 42AN: 236314 AF XY: 0.000188 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000313 AC: 455AN: 1454920Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000324 AC XY: 234AN XY: 722828 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000253 AC: 38AN: 150066Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000232 AC XY: 17AN XY: 73202 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at