1-153796264-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The ENST00000633218.1(ENSG00000291199):n.622C>T variant causes a non coding transcript exon change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.41 in 152,752 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13,988 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000633218.1 non_coding_transcript_exon
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- severe intellectual disability-poor language-strabismus-grimacing face-long fingers syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: ENST00000633218.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GATAD2B | TSL:5 | c.134-6188G>A | intron | N/A | ENSP00000490724.1 | A0A1B0GW07 | |||
| ENSG00000231827 | TSL:6 | n.607C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 2 of 11 | |||||
| ENSG00000291199 | TSL:3 | n.622C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.410 AC: 62412AN: 152122Hom.: 13926 Cov.: 34 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.455 AC: 233AN: 512Hom.: 58 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.432 AC XY: 140AN XY: 324 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.410 AC: 62428AN: 152240Hom.: 13930 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.401 AC XY: 29850AN XY: 74446 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at