1-154572014-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000748.3(CHRNB2):​c.1191G>C​(p.Gln397His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0115 in 1,533,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 121 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q397P) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0067 ( 7 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 114 hom. )

Consequence

CHRNB2
NM_000748.3 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.149

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CHRNB2 (HGNC:1962): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic beta 2 subunit) Neuronal acetylcholine receptors are homo- or heteropentameric complexes composed of homologous alpha and beta subunits. They belong to a superfamily of ligand-gated ion channels which allow the flow of sodium and potassium across the plasma membrane in response to ligands such as acetylcholine and nicotine. This gene encodes one of several beta subunits. Mutations in this gene are associated with autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CHRNB2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • familial sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0069208145).
BP6
Variant 1-154572014-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-154572014-G-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 158330.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1014 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000748.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CHRNB2
NM_000748.3
MANE Select
c.1191G>Cp.Gln397His
missense
Exon 5 of 6NP_000739.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CHRNB2
ENST00000368476.4
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.1191G>Cp.Gln397His
missense
Exon 5 of 6ENSP00000357461.3
CHRNB2
ENST00000637900.1
TSL:5
c.1197G>Cp.Gln399His
missense
Exon 5 of 6ENSP00000490474.1
CHRNB2
ENST00000636034.1
TSL:5
n.1191G>C
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 5 of 9ENSP00000489703.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00666
AC:
1014
AN:
152266
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00768
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00517
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00227
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00169
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00525
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00583
AC:
757
AN:
129764
AF XY:
0.00556
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000623
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00162
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00673
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0120
AC:
16598
AN:
1381564
Hom.:
114
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0117
AC XY:
7948
AN XY:
681480
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00213
AC:
67
AN:
31460
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00377
AC:
134
AN:
35532
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000519
AC:
13
AN:
25046
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
35644
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00262
AC:
207
AN:
79072
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00252
AC:
88
AN:
34878
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000561
AC:
3
AN:
5350
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0144
AC:
15498
AN:
1076920
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
588
AN:
57662
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.495
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1101
2202
3302
4403
5504
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
602
1204
1806
2408
3010
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00665
AC:
1014
AN:
152384
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00617
AC XY:
460
AN XY:
74524
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00274
AC:
114
AN:
41594
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00516
AC:
79
AN:
15312
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00228
AC:
11
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00169
AC:
18
AN:
10632
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0114
AC:
774
AN:
68034
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00520
AC:
11
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.498
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
59
118
177
236
295
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00703
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00711
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000644
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00544
AC:
35
ExAC
AF:
0.00223
AC:
180
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Jul 07, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

May 14, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Sep 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CHRNB2: BS1, BS2

Dec 01, 2016
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Nov 09, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy 3 Uncertain:1
Jan 15, 2014
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
May 28, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.12
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.47
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.93
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.27
T
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.15
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.54
T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.15
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0069
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.36
N
PhyloP100
0.15
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.79
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.37
N
REVEL
Benign
0.25
Sift
Benign
0.24
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.28
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.31
MutPred
0.13
Gain of catalytic residue at L399 (P = 0.0997)
MVP
0.66
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.0037
T
GERP RS
2.8
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.69
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs55685423; hg19: chr1-154544490; COSMIC: COSV63809188; COSMIC: COSV63809188; API