1-154572014-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000748.3(CHRNB2):āc.1191G>Cā(p.Gln397His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0115 in 1,533,948 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 121 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000748.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNB2 | NM_000748.3 | c.1191G>C | p.Gln397His | missense_variant | 5/6 | ENST00000368476.4 | NP_000739.1 | |
CHRNB2 | XM_017000180.3 | c.681G>C | p.Gln227His | missense_variant | 2/3 | XP_016855669.1 | ||
CHRNB2 | XR_001736952.3 | n.1458G>C | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 5/7 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRNB2 | ENST00000368476.4 | c.1191G>C | p.Gln397His | missense_variant | 5/6 | 1 | NM_000748.3 | ENSP00000357461 | P4 | |
CHRNB2 | ENST00000637900.1 | c.1197G>C | p.Gln399His | missense_variant | 5/6 | 5 | ENSP00000490474 | A1 | ||
CHRNB2 | ENST00000636034.1 | c.1191G>C | p.Gln397His | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 5/9 | 5 | ENSP00000489703 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00666 AC: 1014AN: 152266Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00583 AC: 757AN: 129764Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.00556 AC XY: 395AN XY: 71032
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0120 AC: 16598AN: 1381564Hom.: 114 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0117 AC XY: 7948AN XY: 681480
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00665 AC: 1014AN: 152384Hom.: 7 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00617 AC XY: 460AN XY: 74524
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 07, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 14, 2015 | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | CHRNB2: PP2, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Dec 01, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 09, 2017 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 15, 2014 | - - |
Autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 28, 2017 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at