1-154589872-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001111.5(ADAR):c.2553C>T(p.Cys851=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00494 in 1,614,078 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 30 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0028 ( 2 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0052 ( 28 hom. )
Consequence
ADAR
NM_001111.5 synonymous
NM_001111.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.561
Genes affected
ADAR (HGNC:225): (adenosine deaminase RNA specific) This gene encodes the enzyme responsible for RNA editing by site-specific deamination of adenosines. This enzyme destabilizes double-stranded RNA through conversion of adenosine to inosine. Mutations in this gene have been associated with dyschromatosis symmetrica hereditaria. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 1-154589872-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-154589872-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 285022.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-154589872-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr1-154589872-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.561 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00284 (432/152218) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00509 (346/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00465. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 192 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAR | NM_001111.5 | c.2553C>T | p.Cys851= | synonymous_variant | 8/15 | ENST00000368474.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAR | ENST00000368474.9 | c.2553C>T | p.Cys851= | synonymous_variant | 8/15 | 1 | NM_001111.5 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00285 AC: 433AN: 152100Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
433
AN:
152100
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00249 AC: 625AN: 251274Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00221 AC XY: 300AN XY: 135812
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
625
AN:
251274
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
300
AN XY:
135812
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00515 AC: 7535AN: 1461860Hom.: 28 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00488 AC XY: 3551AN XY: 727226
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
7535
AN:
1461860
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3551
AN XY:
727226
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00284 AC: 432AN: 152218Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00258 AC XY: 192AN XY: 74404
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
432
AN:
152218
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
192
AN XY:
74404
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | ADAR: BP4, BP7, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 29, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Dec 09, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Symmetrical dyschromatosis of extremities;C3539013:Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 6 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Aug 26, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 6 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
ADAR-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jun 15, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Symmetrical dyschromatosis of extremities Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at