Menu
GeneBe

1-156114969-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_170707.4(LMNA):c.51C>T(p.Ser17=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0128 in 1,589,738 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 154 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0098 ( 10 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.013 ( 144 hom. )

Consequence

LMNA
NM_170707.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:32O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0150
Variant links:
Genes affected
LMNA (HGNC:6636): (lamin A/C) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the nuclear lamina, a two-dimensional matrix of proteins located next to the inner nuclear membrane. The lamin family of proteins make up the matrix and are highly conserved in evolution. During mitosis, the lamina matrix is reversibly disassembled as the lamin proteins are phosphorylated. Lamin proteins are thought to be involved in nuclear stability, chromatin structure and gene expression. Vertebrate lamins consist of two types, A and B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene lead to several diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, familial partial lipodystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 1-156114969-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-156114969-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 36479.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-156114969-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-156114969-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr1-156114969-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_pathogenic].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.015 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00981 (1494/152354) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.0172 (264/15310). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0155. There are 10 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 682 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 11 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
LMNANM_170707.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.51C>T p.Ser17= synonymous_variant 1/12 ENST00000368300.9
LMNANM_005572.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.51C>T p.Ser17= synonymous_variant 1/10 ENST00000677389.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
LMNAENST00000368300.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.51C>T p.Ser17= synonymous_variant 1/121 NM_170707.4 P1P02545-1
LMNAENST00000677389.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.51C>T p.Ser17= synonymous_variant 1/10 NM_005572.4 P02545-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00983
AC:
1496
AN:
152236
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00321
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00496
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0223
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0163
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0104
AC:
2173
AN:
208132
Hom.:
16
AF XY:
0.0105
AC XY:
1185
AN XY:
112810
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0140
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0170
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00418
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00515
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0140
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0135
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0131
AC:
18794
AN:
1437384
Hom.:
144
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0128
AC XY:
9133
AN XY:
712778
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00222
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0148
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0155
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000262
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00399
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00445
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0147
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0141
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00981
AC:
1494
AN:
152354
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00915
AC XY:
682
AN XY:
74496
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00320
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0172
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0179
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00476
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0161
Alfa
AF:
0.0102
Hom.:
9
Bravo
AF:
0.0106
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:32Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:9
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineNov 26, 2012Ser17Ser in exon 1 of LMNA: This variant is not expected to have clinical signif icance because it has been identified in 1.3% (108/8542) of European American ch romosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:// evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/; dbSNP rs11549668). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoNov 04, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)May 30, 2013- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart InstituteMay 30, 2020- -
not provided Benign:4Other:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyEpithelial Biology; Institute of Medical Biology, Singapore-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsAug 28, 2017- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024LMNA: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 21, 2023- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 15, 2018- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOct 27, 2015- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1A Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingBiochemical Molecular Genetic Laboratory, King Abdulaziz Medical CityFeb 05, 2020- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2B1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Congenital muscular dystrophy due to LMNA mutation Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hutchinson-Gilford syndrome;C0410190:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 2, autosomal dominant;C0796031:Dilated cardiomyopathy-hypergonadotropic hypogonadism syndrome;C1449563:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1A;C1720860:Familial partial lipodystrophy, Dunnigan type;C1854154:Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2B1;C1857829:Heart-hand syndrome, Slovenian type;C2750035:Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 3, autosomal recessive;C2750785:Congenital muscular dystrophy due to LMNA mutation;C5399785:Mandibuloacral dysplasia with type A lipodystrophy;C5676942:Restrictive dermopathy 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsApr 17, 2022- -
Hutchinson-Gilford syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Mandibuloacral dysplasia with type A lipodystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy, Recessive Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Lethal tight skin contracture syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Lipoatrophy with Diabetes, Hepatic Steatosis, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, and Leukomelanodermic Papules Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Familial partial lipodystrophy, Dunnigan type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpAug 18, 2011- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 14, 2012General population or subpopulation frequency is too high to be a pathogenic mutation based on disease/syndrome prevalence and penetrance -
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy 2, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
Cadd
Benign
13
Dann
Benign
0.93

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11549668; hg19: chr1-156084760; API