1-156134954-G-A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points: 10P and 5B. PVS1PM2BP6BS1

The NM_001406994.1(LMNA):c.125G>A(p.Trp42*) variant causes a stop gained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000719 in 1,614,198 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00044 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000034 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LMNA
NM_001406994.1 stop_gained

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.52

Variant links:

Genes affected

LMNA (HGNC:6636): (lamin A/C) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the nuclear lamina, a two-dimensional matrix of proteins located next to the inner nuclear membrane. The lamin family of proteins make up the matrix and are highly conserved in evolution. During mitosis, the lamina matrix is reversibly disassembled as the lamin proteins are phosphorylated. Lamin proteins are thought to be involved in nuclear stability, chromatin structure and gene expression. Vertebrate lamins consist of two types, A and B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene lead to several diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, familial partial lipodystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

LMNA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 5 ACMG points.

PVS1

Loss of function variant, product undergoes nonsense mediated mRNA decay. LoF is a known mechanism of disease.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP6

Variant 1-156134954-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-156134954-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48082.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=8, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00044 (67/152334) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00154 (64/41578). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00124. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 31 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LMNA	NM_170707.4 link	c.789G>A	p.Leu263Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 12	ENST00000368300.9	NP_733821.1	P02545-1A0A384MQX1
LMNA	NM_005572.4 link	c.789G>A	p.Leu263Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10	ENST00000677389.1	NP_005563.1	P02545-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
LMNA	ENST00000368300.9 link	c.789G>A	p.Leu263Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 12	1	NM_170707.4	ENSP00000357283.4		P02545-1
LMNA	ENST00000677389.1 link	c.789G>A	p.Leu263Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 4 of 10		NM_005572.4	ENSP00000503633.1		P02545-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000440

AC:

AN:

152216

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000875

AC:

AN:

251396

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000809

AC XY:

AN XY:

135922

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00117

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000335

AC:

AN:

1461864

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000275

AC XY:

AN XY:

727232

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00125

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

8.99e-7

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000662

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000440

AC:

AN:

152334

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000416

AC XY:

AN XY:

74494

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000147

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000473

Alfa

AF:

0.000154

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000453

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Nov 23, 2020

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 19, 2009

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 23, 2014

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 05, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 22, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Dec 04, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 21, 2019

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2

Benign:1

Jan 27, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Primary dilated cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Dec 18, 2023

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Nov 29, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.69

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.97

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.13

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over