Menu
GeneBe

1-156153629-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBS1_Supporting

The NM_022367.4(SEMA4A):​c.-165G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00159 in 152,300 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

SEMA4A
NM_022367.4 5_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.427
Variant links:
Genes affected
SEMA4A (HGNC:10729): (semaphorin 4A) This gene encodes a member of the semaphorin family of soluble and transmembrane proteins. Semaphorins are involved in numerous functions, including axon guidance, morphogenesis, carcinogenesis, and immunomodulation. The encoded protein is a single-pass type I membrane protein containing an immunoglobulin-like C2-type domain, a PSI domain and a sema domain. It inhibits axonal extension by providing local signals to specify territories inaccessible for growing axons. It is an activator of T-cell-mediated immunity and suppresses vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated endothelial cell migration and proliferation in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo. Mutations in this gene are associated with retinal degenerative diseases including retinitis pigmentosa type 35 (RP35) and cone-rod dystrophy type 10 (CORD10). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.68).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00159 (242/152300) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00373 (18/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00241. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 114 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SEMA4ANM_022367.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-165G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/15 ENST00000368285.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SEMA4AENST00000368285.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.-165G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/151 NM_022367.4 P1Q9H3S1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00159
AC:
242
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000384
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00372
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000848
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AC0
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
188
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.00
AC XY:
0
AN XY:
124
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00159
AC:
242
AN:
152300
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00153
AC XY:
114
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000385
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000848
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00263
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000477
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00152
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Retinitis Pigmentosa, Recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Cone-rod dystrophy 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Retinitis pigmentosa Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Benign
0.87

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs113436119; hg19: chr1-156123420; API