1-158677732-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_003126.4(SPTA1):​c.915T>C​(p.Ser305Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.568 in 1,613,240 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 265,416 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.50 ( 20397 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.58 ( 245019 hom. )

Consequence

SPTA1
NM_003126.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.01

Publications

21 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPTA1 (HGNC:11272): (spectrin alpha, erythrocytic 1) This gene encodes a member of a family of molecular scaffold proteins that link the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton and functions in the determination of cell shape, arrangement of transmembrane proteins, and organization of organelles. The encoded protein is primarily composed of 22 spectrin repeats which are involved in dimer formation. It forms a component of the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene result in a variety of hereditary red blood cell disorders, including elliptocytosis-2, pyropoikilocytosis, and spherocytosis, type 3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
SPTA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary spherocytosis type 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • elliptocytosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary elliptocytosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary spherocytosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 1-158677732-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-158677732-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258961.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.01 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.591 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SPTA1NM_003126.4 linkc.915T>C p.Ser305Ser synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 52 ENST00000643759.2 NP_003117.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SPTA1ENST00000643759.2 linkc.915T>C p.Ser305Ser synonymous_variant Exon 7 of 52 NM_003126.4 ENSP00000495214.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.499
AC:
75879
AN:
151916
Hom.:
20388
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.282
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.459
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.545
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.575
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.569
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.445
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.628
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.532
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.596
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.531
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.550
AC:
136717
AN:
248598
AF XY:
0.552
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.267
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.546
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.579
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.550
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.630
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.596
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.572
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.576
AC:
840969
AN:
1461206
Hom.:
245019
Cov.:
60
AF XY:
0.573
AC XY:
416545
AN XY:
726906
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.265
AC:
8847
AN:
33448
American (AMR)
AF:
0.548
AC:
24442
AN:
44636
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.575
AC:
15014
AN:
26116
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.546
AC:
21680
AN:
39674
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.460
AC:
39668
AN:
86244
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.633
AC:
33786
AN:
53372
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.568
AC:
3275
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.594
AC:
659955
AN:
1111594
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.568
AC:
34302
AN:
60356
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
20565
41130
61696
82261
102826
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
17862
35724
53586
71448
89310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.499
AC:
75916
AN:
152034
Hom.:
20397
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.502
AC XY:
37330
AN XY:
74312
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.282
AC:
11688
AN:
41470
American (AMR)
AF:
0.546
AC:
8320
AN:
15250
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.575
AC:
1996
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.569
AC:
2935
AN:
5158
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.445
AC:
2150
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.628
AC:
6645
AN:
10574
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.531
AC:
156
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.596
AC:
40478
AN:
67964
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.534
AC:
1130
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1834
3668
5503
7337
9171
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
674
1348
2022
2696
3370
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.564
Hom.:
106922
Bravo
AF:
0.486
Asia WGS
AF:
0.533
AC:
1850
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.591
EpiControl
AF:
0.599

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Nov 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jun 09, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:3
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Elliptocytosis 2 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary spherocytosis type 3 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.48
CADD
Benign
7.9
DANN
Benign
0.80
PhyloP100
1.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs703121; hg19: chr1-158647522; COSMIC: COSV63750610; API