1-158686491-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_003126.4(SPTA1):​c.24+3A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.995 in 1,589,362 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 787,145 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.97 ( 72249 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 1.0 ( 714896 hom. )

Consequence

SPTA1
NM_003126.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.001238
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.454

Publications

14 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SPTA1 (HGNC:11272): (spectrin alpha, erythrocytic 1) This gene encodes a member of a family of molecular scaffold proteins that link the plasma membrane to the actin cytoskeleton and functions in the determination of cell shape, arrangement of transmembrane proteins, and organization of organelles. The encoded protein is primarily composed of 22 spectrin repeats which are involved in dimer formation. It forms a component of the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Mutations in this gene result in a variety of hereditary red blood cell disorders, including elliptocytosis-2, pyropoikilocytosis, and spherocytosis, type 3. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
SPTA1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • hereditary spherocytosis type 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • elliptocytosis 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • hereditary elliptocytosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • hereditary spherocytosis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).
BP6
Variant 1-158686491-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-158686491-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 258920.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.994 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SPTA1NM_003126.4 linkc.24+3A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 1 of 51 ENST00000643759.2 NP_003117.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SPTA1ENST00000643759.2 linkc.24+3A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 1 of 51 NM_003126.4 ENSP00000495214.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.974
AC:
148060
AN:
152048
Hom.:
72195
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.909
Gnomad AMI
AF:
1.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.989
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
1.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.999
Gnomad FIN
AF:
1.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.997
Gnomad NFE
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.977
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.993
AC:
247474
AN:
249186
AF XY:
0.995
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.905
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.995
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
1.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.997
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.997
AC:
1433334
AN:
1437196
Hom.:
714896
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.998
AC XY:
714922
AN XY:
716616
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.909
AC:
29728
AN:
32704
American (AMR)
AF:
0.994
AC:
44352
AN:
44630
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
1.00
AC:
25954
AN:
25954
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
39520
AN:
39520
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
85592
AN:
85626
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
1.00
AC:
53360
AN:
53360
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.991
AC:
5536
AN:
5588
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
1.00
AC:
1090217
AN:
1090350
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.993
AC:
59075
AN:
59464
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
155
309
464
618
773
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
21108
42216
63324
84432
105540
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.974
AC:
148171
AN:
152166
Hom.:
72249
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.975
AC XY:
72533
AN XY:
74386
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.910
AC:
37736
AN:
41490
American (AMR)
AF:
0.989
AC:
15095
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
1.00
AC:
3472
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
1.00
AC:
5190
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.999
AC:
4823
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
1.00
AC:
10596
AN:
10596
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.993
AC:
292
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
1.00
AC:
67994
AN:
68006
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.978
AC:
2061
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
181
362
542
723
904
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
916
1832
2748
3664
4580
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.988
Hom.:
58045
Bravo
AF:
0.970
Asia WGS
AF:
0.995
AC:
3460
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
1.00
EpiControl
AF:
1.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:3
Nov 29, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Elliptocytosis 2 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary spherocytosis type 3 Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Pyropoikilocytosis, hereditary Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Jul 15, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.82
PhyloP100
0.45
PromoterAI
-0.055
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0012
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.050
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2564858; hg19: chr1-158656281; API