1-160419432-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points: 3P and 0B. PM2PP3
The NM_020335.3(VANGL2):c.623G>C(p.Arg208Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,459,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R208Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_020335.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- neural tube defects, susceptibility toInheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: MODERATE, LIMITED Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 3 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_020335.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VANGL2 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.623G>C | p.Arg208Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 8 | ENSP00000357040.2 | Q9ULK5 | ||
| VANGL2 | c.767G>C | p.Arg256Pro | missense | Exon 4 of 8 | ENSP00000512747.1 | A0A8Q3SIN7 | |||
| VANGL2 | TSL:3 | n.-61G>C | upstream_gene | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 31
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000400 AC: 1AN: 249726 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1459204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 726092 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 31
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at