1-16044544-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_000085.5(CLCNKB):c.52C>G(p.Leu18Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000687 in 1,454,626 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L18L) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000085.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Bartter disease type 3Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- Bartter disease type 4BInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P
- Bartter syndrome type 4Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Gitelman syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000085.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLCNKB | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.52C>G | p.Leu18Val | missense | Exon 2 of 20 | ENSP00000364831.5 | P51801-1 | ||
| CLCNKB | c.52C>G | p.Leu18Val | missense | Exon 2 of 21 | ENSP00000576322.1 | ||||
| CLCNKB | c.52C>G | p.Leu18Val | missense | Exon 2 of 21 | ENSP00000576329.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.87e-7 AC: 1AN: 1454626Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 722566 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at