Variant 1-16125049-C-T details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_004431.5(EPHA2):c.*166G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00587 in 686,488 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 126 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.018 ( 89 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 ( 37 hom. )

Consequence

EPHA2
NM_004431.5 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.632

Variant links:

Genes affected

EPHA2 (HGNC:3386): (EPH receptor A2) This gene belongs to the ephrin receptor subfamily of the protein-tyrosine kinase family. EPH and EPH-related receptors have been implicated in mediating developmental events, particularly in the nervous system. Receptors in the EPH subfamily typically have a single kinase domain and an extracellular region containing a Cys-rich domain and 2 fibronectin type III repeats. The ephrin receptors are divided into 2 groups based on the similarity of their extracellular domain sequences and their affinities for binding ephrin-A and ephrin-B ligands. This gene encodes a protein that binds ephrin-A ligands. Mutations in this gene are the cause of certain genetically-related cataract disorders.[provided by RefSeq, May 2010]

EPHA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).

BP6

Variant 1-16125049-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-16125049-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 293404.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BA1

GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.058 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
EPHA2	NM_004431.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.*166G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	17/17	ENST00000358432.8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
EPHA2	ENST00000358432.8 linkuse as main transcript	c.*166G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	17/17	1	NM_004431.5	P1	P29317-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0177

AC:

2688

AN:

152198

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0597

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0109

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00633

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.0124

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00247

AC:

1322

AN:

534172

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00197

AC XY:

555

AN XY:

281526

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0607

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00528

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000130

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000154

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00625

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0178

AC:

2705

AN:

152316

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0172

AC XY:

1284

AN XY:

74482

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0600

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0109

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000250

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.0123

Alfa

AF:

0.00870

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0204

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00433

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 6 multiple types

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Nov 10, 2018

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.79

CADD

Benign

1.8

DANN

Benign

0.75

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over