1-167809790-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_018417.6(ADCY10):c.4721C>T(p.Thr1574Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00216 in 1,614,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 63 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018417.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADCY10 | NM_018417.6 | c.4721C>T | p.Thr1574Met | missense_variant | 33/33 | ENST00000367851.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADCY10 | ENST00000367851.9 | c.4721C>T | p.Thr1574Met | missense_variant | 33/33 | 1 | NM_018417.6 | P1 | |
ADCY10 | ENST00000367848.1 | c.4445C>T | p.Thr1482Met | missense_variant | 33/33 | 1 | |||
ADCY10 | ENST00000545172.5 | c.4262C>T | p.Thr1421Met | missense_variant | 30/30 | 2 | |||
ADCY10 | ENST00000485964.5 | c.*1657C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 15/15 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00396 AC: 603AN: 152126Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00498 AC: 1252AN: 251406Hom.: 31 AF XY: 0.00455 AC XY: 618AN XY: 135882
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00198 AC: 2890AN: 1461786Hom.: 51 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00190 AC XY: 1380AN XY: 727196
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00396 AC: 603AN: 152244Hom.: 12 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00617 AC XY: 459AN XY: 74450
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 01, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at