1-169542317-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000130.5(F5):​c.2773A>G​(p.Lys925Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.269 in 1,613,780 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 60,109 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.25 ( 4743 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.27 ( 55366 hom. )

Consequence

F5
NM_000130.5 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.376

Publications

45 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
F5 (HGNC:3542): (coagulation factor V) This gene encodes an essential cofactor of the blood coagulation cascade. This factor circulates in plasma, and is converted to the active form by the release of the activation peptide by thrombin during coagulation. This generates a heavy chain and a light chain which are held together by calcium ions. The activated protein is a cofactor that participates with activated coagulation factor X to activate prothrombin to thrombin. Defects in this gene result in either an autosomal recessive hemorrhagic diathesis or an autosomal dominant form of thrombophilia, which is known as activated protein C resistance. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
F5 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • thrombophilia due to activated protein C resistance
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
  • congenital factor V deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • East Texas bleeding disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0026506782).
BP6
Variant 1-169542317-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-169542317-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 255202.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.334 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
F5NM_000130.5 linkc.2773A>G p.Lys925Glu missense_variant Exon 13 of 25 ENST00000367797.9 NP_000121.2 P12259

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
F5ENST00000367797.9 linkc.2773A>G p.Lys925Glu missense_variant Exon 13 of 25 1 NM_000130.5 ENSP00000356771.3 P12259
F5ENST00000367796.3 linkc.2788A>G p.Lys930Glu missense_variant Exon 13 of 25 5 ENSP00000356770.3 A0A0A0MRJ7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.245
AC:
37254
AN:
151954
Hom.:
4731
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.183
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.191
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.341
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.168
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.234
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.323
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.211
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.242
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.267
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.261
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.279
AC:
69910
AN:
251014
AF XY:
0.278
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.179
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.415
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.177
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.221
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.213
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.268
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.285
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.272
AC:
397264
AN:
1461708
Hom.:
55366
Cov.:
64
AF XY:
0.273
AC XY:
198289
AN XY:
727160
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.180
AC:
6014
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.409
AC:
18273
AN:
44708
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.176
AC:
4594
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.226
AC:
8990
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.325
AC:
28070
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.217
AC:
11597
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.273
AC:
1575
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.272
AC:
302218
AN:
1111866
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.264
AC:
15933
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
19308
38616
57925
77233
96541
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10182
20364
30546
40728
50910
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.245
AC:
37295
AN:
152072
Hom.:
4743
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.247
AC XY:
18356
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.183
AC:
7590
AN:
41492
American (AMR)
AF:
0.342
AC:
5212
AN:
15254
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.168
AC:
581
AN:
3466
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.234
AC:
1211
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.323
AC:
1559
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.211
AC:
2241
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.233
AC:
68
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.267
AC:
18110
AN:
67950
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.260
AC:
549
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.509
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1452
2904
4355
5807
7259
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
394
788
1182
1576
1970
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.262
Hom.:
13007
Bravo
AF:
0.254
TwinsUK
AF:
0.270
AC:
1000
ALSPAC
AF:
0.280
AC:
1080
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.184
AC:
812
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.274
AC:
2355
ExAC
AF:
0.274
AC:
33213
Asia WGS
AF:
0.283
AC:
983
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.269
EpiControl
AF:
0.270

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Nov 11, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Thrombophilia due to activated protein C resistance Benign:2
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital factor V deficiency Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Budd-Chiari syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Factor V deficiency Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Thrombophilia due to thrombin defect Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.075
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.88
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.90
CADD
Benign
0.062
DANN
Benign
0.24
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.013
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-1.8
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.9
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.00071
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.25
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0027
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.90
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.51
N;.
PhyloP100
-0.38
PrimateAI
Benign
0.46
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.42
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.077
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.99
T;T
Polyphen
0.0
B;.
Vest4
0.038
MPC
0.12
ClinPred
0.0040
T
GERP RS
-5.1
Varity_R
0.040
gMVP
0.19
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs6032; hg19: chr1-169511555; COSMIC: COSV63120680; API