1-169851914-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2
The NM_001320047.2(FIRRM):āc.2342A>Cā(p.Glu781Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00116 in 1,614,086 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001320047.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIRRM | NM_001320047.2 | c.2342A>C | p.Glu781Ala | missense_variant | 24/25 | ENST00000359326.9 | NP_001306976.1 | |
SCYL3 | NM_020423.7 | c.*1799T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/13 | ENST00000367771.11 | NP_065156.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1orf112 | ENST00000359326.9 | c.2342A>C | p.Glu781Ala | missense_variant | 24/25 | 1 | NM_001320047.2 | ENSP00000352276.4 | ||
SCYL3 | ENST00000367771 | c.*1799T>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 13/13 | 1 | NM_020423.7 | ENSP00000356745.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00190 AC: 289AN: 152226Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00185 AC: 465AN: 251180Hom.: 8 AF XY: 0.00179 AC XY: 243AN XY: 135750
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00109 AC: 1589AN: 1461742Hom.: 13 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00108 AC XY: 786AN XY: 727174
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00190 AC: 289AN: 152344Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00166 AC XY: 124AN XY: 74498
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 06, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at