1-179550915-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_014625.4(NPHS2):c.*258A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.273 in 512,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 20,589 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.24 ( 4898 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.29 ( 15691 hom. )
Consequence
NPHS2
NM_014625.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_014625.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.259
Genes affected
NPHS2 (HGNC:13394): (NPHS2 stomatin family member, podocin) This gene encodes a protein that plays a role in the regulation of glomerular permeability. Mutations in this gene cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 1-179550915-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-179550915-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 224485.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.343 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS2 | NM_014625.4 | c.*258A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000367615.9 | ||
AXDND1 | NM_144696.6 | c.3032-3597T>C | intron_variant | ENST00000367618.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS2 | ENST00000367615.9 | c.*258A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_014625.4 | P1 | ||
AXDND1 | ENST00000367618.8 | c.3032-3597T>C | intron_variant | 1 | NM_144696.6 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.242 AC: 36751AN: 151984Hom.: 4892 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
36751
AN:
151984
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.286 AC: 103298AN: 360826Hom.: 15691 Cov.: 4 AF XY: 0.290 AC XY: 55549AN XY: 191260
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
103298
AN:
360826
Hom.:
Cov.:
4
AF XY:
AC XY:
55549
AN XY:
191260
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.242 AC: 36768AN: 152104Hom.: 4898 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.243 AC XY: 18041AN XY: 74352
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
36768
AN:
152104
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
18041
AN XY:
74352
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1301
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Nephrotic syndrome, type 2 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 08, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Human Genetics Disease in Children – Taif University, Taif University | Jan 01, 2016 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 20, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at