1-179551016-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_014625.4(NPHS2):c.*157G>A variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.924 in 829,342 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 354,642 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.91 ( 62802 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.93 ( 291840 hom. )
Consequence
NPHS2
NM_014625.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_014625.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.54
Genes affected
NPHS2 (HGNC:13394): (NPHS2 stomatin family member, podocin) This gene encodes a protein that plays a role in the regulation of glomerular permeability. Mutations in this gene cause steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2014]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 1-179551016-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-179551016-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 224483.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.942 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS2 | NM_014625.4 | c.*157G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000367615.9 | ||
AXDND1 | NM_144696.6 | c.3032-3496C>T | intron_variant | ENST00000367618.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPHS2 | ENST00000367615.9 | c.*157G>A | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_014625.4 | P1 | ||
AXDND1 | ENST00000367618.8 | c.3032-3496C>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_144696.6 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.907 AC: 138022AN: 152136Hom.: 62758 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
138022
AN:
152136
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.928 AC: 628291AN: 677088Hom.: 291840 Cov.: 9 AF XY: 0.926 AC XY: 327031AN XY: 353268
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
628291
AN:
677088
Hom.:
Cov.:
9
AF XY:
AC XY:
327031
AN XY:
353268
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.907 AC: 138126AN: 152254Hom.: 62802 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.908 AC XY: 67546AN XY: 74430
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
138126
AN:
152254
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
67546
AN XY:
74430
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3185
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Nephrotic syndrome, type 2 Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Human Genetics Disease in Children – Taif University, Taif University | Jan 01, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 08, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 12, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at