1-185091750-A-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_Strong
The NM_007212.4(RNF2):c.248+11A>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Consequence
RNF2
NM_007212.4 intron
NM_007212.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.941
Genes affected
RNF2 (HGNC:10061): (ring finger protein 2) Polycomb group (PcG) of proteins form the multiprotein complexes that are important for the transcription repression of various genes involved in development and cell proliferation. The protein encoded by this gene is one of the PcG proteins. It has been shown to interact with, and suppress the activity of, transcription factor CP2 (TFCP2/CP2). Studies of the mouse counterpart suggested the involvement of this gene in the specification of anterior-posterior axis, as well as in cell proliferation in early development. This protein was also found to interact with huntingtin interacting protein 2 (HIP2), an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, and possess ubiquitin ligase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNF2 | NM_007212.4 | c.248+11A>T | intron_variant | ENST00000367510.8 | |||
RNF2 | XM_005245413.4 | c.101+11A>T | intron_variant | ||||
RNF2 | XM_011509851.4 | c.248+11A>T | intron_variant | ||||
RNF2 | XM_011509852.3 | c.248+11A>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNF2 | ENST00000367510.8 | c.248+11A>T | intron_variant | 1 | NM_007212.4 | P1 | |||
RNF2 | ENST00000367509.8 | c.248+11A>T | intron_variant | 2 | |||||
RNF2 | ENST00000453650.2 | c.248+11A>T | intron_variant | 5 | |||||
RNF2 | ENST00000498201.1 | n.375A>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
30
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
?
Cov.:
32
ClinVar
Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 16, 2023 | Variant summary: RNF2 c.248+11A>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide located at a position not widely known to affect splicing. Consensus agreement among computation tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant was absent in 249682 control chromosomes. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.248+11A>T in individuals affected with Luo-Schoch Syndrome and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. No submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
No publications associated with this variant yet.