1-196726612-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The ENST00000367429.9(CFH):ā€‹c.2016A>Gā€‹(p.Gln672=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.174 in 1,608,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 28,710 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.15 ( 2399 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.18 ( 26311 hom. )

Consequence

CFH
ENST00000367429.9 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0700
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFH (HGNC:4883): (complement factor H) This gene is a member of the Regulator of Complement Activation (RCA) gene cluster and encodes a protein with twenty short consensus repeat (SCR) domains. This protein is secreted into the bloodstream and has an essential role in the regulation of complement activation, restricting this innate defense mechanism to microbial infections. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) and chronic hypocomplementemic nephropathy. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms, have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
Variant 1-196726612-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-196726612-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 294498.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-196726612-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.07 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.468 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CFHNM_000186.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2016A>G p.Gln672= synonymous_variant 13/22 ENST00000367429.9 NP_000177.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CFHENST00000367429.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.2016A>G p.Gln672= synonymous_variant 13/221 NM_000186.4 ENSP00000356399 P2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.152
AC:
23159
AN:
152090
Hom.:
2399
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0598
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.257
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.224
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.117
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.483
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.150
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.143
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.203
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.169
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.158
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.204
AC:
51150
AN:
250754
Hom.:
6984
AF XY:
0.196
AC XY:
26513
AN XY:
135512
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0573
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.355
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.122
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.505
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.145
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.167
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.194
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.177
AC:
257139
AN:
1456602
Hom.:
26311
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.175
AC XY:
126598
AN XY:
724974
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0505
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.335
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.121
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.480
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.142
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.140
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.169
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.174
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.152
AC:
23152
AN:
152208
Hom.:
2399
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.153
AC XY:
11375
AN XY:
74398
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0597
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.224
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.117
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.484
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.150
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.143
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.169
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.156
Alfa
AF:
0.172
Hom.:
4260
Bravo
AF:
0.160
Asia WGS
AF:
0.235
AC:
817
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.170
EpiControl
AF:
0.173

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Hemolytic uremic syndrome, atypical, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Age related macular degeneration 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
Basal laminar drusen Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Factor H deficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJul 22, 2021- -
CFH-Related Dense Deposit Disease / Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis Type II Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases was too high to be consistent with this variant causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenSep 27, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.58
CADD
Benign
3.4
DANN
Benign
0.43

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.050
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3753396; hg19: chr1-196695742; COSMIC: COSV66405881; API