1-196737547-G-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_000186.4(CFH):​c.2669G>T​(p.Ser890Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0119 in 1,613,318 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,602 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. S890T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.059 ( 844 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0070 ( 758 hom. )

Consequence

CFH
NM_000186.4 missense

Scores

16

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:14

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.46
Variant links:
Genes affected
CFH (HGNC:4883): (complement factor H) This gene is a member of the Regulator of Complement Activation (RCA) gene cluster and encodes a protein with twenty short consensus repeat (SCR) domains. This protein is secreted into the bloodstream and has an essential role in the regulation of complement activation, restricting this innate defense mechanism to microbial infections. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) and chronic hypocomplementemic nephropathy. Alternate transcriptional splice variants, encoding different isoforms, have been characterized. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0057353973).
BP6
Variant 1-196737547-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-196737547-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 294507.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-196737547-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr1-196737547-G-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.195 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CFHNM_000186.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.2669G>T p.Ser890Ile missense_variant 17/22 ENST00000367429.9 NP_000177.2 P08603A0A024R962

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CFHENST00000367429.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.2669G>T p.Ser890Ile missense_variant 17/221 NM_000186.4 ENSP00000356399.4 P08603
ENSG00000289697ENST00000696032.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2669G>T p.Ser890Ile missense_variant 17/27 ENSP00000512341.1 A0A8Q3SIA1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0586
AC:
8906
AN:
152054
Hom.:
841
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.199
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0255
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0450
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0170
AC:
4258
AN:
251058
Hom.:
339
AF XY:
0.0129
AC XY:
1752
AN XY:
135682
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.205
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0285
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00980
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00703
AC:
10265
AN:
1461146
Hom.:
758
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00631
AC XY:
4588
AN XY:
726892
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.203
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0124
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0288
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00160
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000793
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0176
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0587
AC:
8936
AN:
152172
Hom.:
844
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0569
AC XY:
4237
AN XY:
74416
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.199
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0254
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00149
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.0445
Alfa
AF:
0.0114
Hom.:
306
Bravo
AF:
0.0667
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.189
AC:
834
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00244
AC:
21
ExAC
AF:
0.0198
AC:
2400
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0140
AC:
48
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00224
EpiControl
AF:
0.00267

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:14
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitternot providedBreakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 29, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 05, 2021This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 15800115, 21881555, 24799305, 29888403, 30046676, 29686068, 23431077, 27884173, 20981092) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Hemolytic uremic syndrome, atypical, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
Basal laminar drusen Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Age related macular degeneration 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
Factor H deficiency Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabApr 11, 2023- -
CFH-Related Dense Deposit Disease / Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis Type II Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJul 08, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.095
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.73
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.68
CADD
Benign
0.081
DANN
Benign
0.94
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.6
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0070
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.44
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0057
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.71
N
REVEL
Benign
0.057
Sift
Benign
0.16
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.14
T
Vest4
0.024
MPC
0.17
ClinPred
0.0013
T
GERP RS
-3.6
gMVP
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs515299; hg19: chr1-196706677; API