1-197101312-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_018136.5(ASPM):c.7939C>A(p.Leu2647Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.389 in 1,610,322 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 129,579 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018136.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | NM_018136.5 | c.7939C>A | p.Leu2647Ile | missense_variant | 18/28 | ENST00000367409.9 | NP_060606.3 | |
ASPM | NM_001206846.2 | c.4066-5148C>A | intron_variant | NP_001193775.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | ENST00000367409.9 | c.7939C>A | p.Leu2647Ile | missense_variant | 18/28 | 1 | NM_018136.5 | ENSP00000356379 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.305 AC: 46211AN: 151428Hom.: 8822 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.334 AC: 83078AN: 248402Hom.: 15551 AF XY: 0.345 AC XY: 46352AN XY: 134290
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.397 AC: 579850AN: 1458776Hom.: 120761 Cov.: 47 AF XY: 0.397 AC XY: 287812AN XY: 725780
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.305 AC: 46211AN: 151546Hom.: 8818 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.301 AC XY: 22266AN XY: 74044
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Aug 02, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:3Other:1
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Jul 14, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at