1-197101391-C-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The ENST00000367409.9(ASPM):āc.7860G>Cā(p.Gln2620His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0663 in 1,608,614 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4,194 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q2620K) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000367409.9 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | NM_018136.5 | c.7860G>C | p.Gln2620His | missense_variant | 18/28 | ENST00000367409.9 | NP_060606.3 | |
ASPM | NM_001206846.2 | c.4066-5227G>C | intron_variant | NP_001193775.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASPM | ENST00000367409.9 | c.7860G>C | p.Gln2620His | missense_variant | 18/28 | 1 | NM_018136.5 | ENSP00000356379 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0487 AC: 7385AN: 151702Hom.: 237 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0507 AC: 12506AN: 246592Hom.: 400 AF XY: 0.0515 AC XY: 6876AN XY: 133528
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0682 AC: 99283AN: 1456794Hom.: 3957 Cov.: 52 AF XY: 0.0674 AC XY: 48851AN XY: 724822
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0486 AC: 7383AN: 151820Hom.: 237 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0463 AC XY: 3432AN XY: 74202
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics | May 31, 2018 | This variant is interpreted as a Benign - Stand Alone. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BA1 => Allele frequency is >5% in Exome Sequencing Project, 1000 Genomes Project, or Exome Aggregation Consortium. BP4 => Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 31, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 20, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Microcephaly 5, primary, autosomal recessive Benign:2Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided, no classification provided | literature only | GeneReviews | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | Apr 11, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at