1-201366882-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001276345.2(TNNT2):c.200-11A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000431 in 1,614,054 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00045 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
TNNT2
NM_001276345.2 intron
NM_001276345.2 intron
Scores
2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00001094
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.143
Genes affected
TNNT2 (HGNC:11949): (troponin T2, cardiac type) This gene encodes the cardiac isoform of troponin T. The encoded protein is the tropomyosin-binding subunit of the troponin complex, which is located on the thin filament of striated muscles and regulates muscle contraction in response to alterations in intracellular calcium ion concentration. Mutations in this gene have been associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as well as with dilated cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 1-201366882-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-201366882-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 188682.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=3}. Variant chr1-201366882-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-201366882-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000256 (39/152218) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00208 (10/4810). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00113. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 23 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 39 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNNT2 | NM_001276345.2 | c.200-11A>G | intron_variant | ENST00000656932.1 | NP_001263274.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNNT2 | ENST00000656932.1 | c.200-11A>G | intron_variant | NM_001276345.2 | ENSP00000499593.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 152100Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
41
AN:
152100
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000648 AC: 163AN: 251442Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000802 AC XY: 109AN XY: 135906
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
163
AN:
251442
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
109
AN XY:
135906
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000449 AC: 657AN: 1461836Hom.: 2 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000534 AC XY: 388AN XY: 727216
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
657
AN:
1461836
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
388
AN XY:
727216
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000256 AC: 39AN: 152218Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 23AN XY: 74424
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
39
AN:
152218
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
74424
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 25, 2016 | Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: At -11 position, 1 publication only - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22017532) - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Dec 12, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Jul 22, 2018 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 3 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Dec 12, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Dec 12, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1D;C1861864:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 2;C2676271:Cardiomyopathy, familial restrictive, 3 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at