1-204944337-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 1P and 9B. PP2BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2
The NM_001005388.3(NFASC):c.22C>T(p.Pro8Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00033 in 1,613,840 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001005388.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFASC | NM_001005388.3 | c.22C>T | p.Pro8Ser | missense_variant | 3/30 | ENST00000339876.11 | |
NFASC | NM_001160331.2 | c.22C>T | p.Pro8Ser | missense_variant | 2/28 | ENST00000539706.6 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NFASC | ENST00000339876.11 | c.22C>T | p.Pro8Ser | missense_variant | 3/30 | 5 | NM_001005388.3 | ||
NFASC | ENST00000539706.6 | c.22C>T | p.Pro8Ser | missense_variant | 2/28 | 5 | NM_001160331.2 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000315 AC: 48AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000537 AC: 134AN: 249632Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000696 AC XY: 94AN XY: 135080
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000332 AC: 485AN: 1461520Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000411 AC XY: 299AN XY: 727018
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000309 AC: 47AN: 152320Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000443 AC XY: 33AN XY: 74484
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Neurodevelopmental disorder with central and peripheral motor dysfunction Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute | Feb 02, 2022 | Based on the classification scheme VCGS_Germline_v1.3.4, this variant is classified as VUS-3B. Following criteria are met: 0102 - Loss of function is a known mechanism of disease in this gene and is associated with neurodevelopmental disorder with central and peripheral motor dysfunction (MIM#618356). (I) 0106 - This gene is associated with autosomal recessive disease. (I) 0200 - Variant is predicted to result in a missense amino acid change from proline to serine. (I) 0252 - This variant is homozygous. (I) 0304 - Variant is present in gnomAD (v2) <0.01 for a recessive condition (138 heterozygotes, 0 homozygotes). (SP) 0502 - Missense variant with conflicting in silico predictions and uninformative conservation. (I) 0604 - Variant is not located in an established domain, motif, hotspot or informative constraint region. (I) 0705 - No comparable missense variants have previous evidence for pathogenicity. (I) 0807 - This variant has no previous evidence of pathogenicity. (I) 0905 - No published segregation evidence has been identified for this variant. (I) 1007 - No published functional evidence has been identified for this variant. (I) 1208 - Inheritance information for this variant is not currently available in this individual. (I) Legend: (SP) - Supporting pathogenic, (I) - Information, (SB) - Supporting benign - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 06, 2023 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge - |
NFASC-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Nov 22, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at