1-207609586-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000651.6(CR1):c.6193A>G(p.Ile2065Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.258 in 1,612,446 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 69,496 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I2065F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000651.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000651.6. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR1 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.6193A>G | p.Ile2065Val | missense | Exon 37 of 47 | ENSP00000356016.4 | E9PDY4 | ||
| CR1 | TSL:1 | c.4843A>G | p.Ile1615Val | missense | Exon 29 of 39 | ENSP00000383744.2 | P17927 | ||
| CR1 | TSL:5 | c.4843A>G | p.Ile1615Val | missense | Exon 29 of 39 | ENSP00000356018.1 | P17927 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.400 AC: 60820AN: 151966Hom.: 16765 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.321 AC: 79225AN: 246530 AF XY: 0.315 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.243 AC: 355524AN: 1460362Hom.: 52693 Cov.: 37 AF XY: 0.248 AC XY: 179804AN XY: 726362 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.401 AC: 60914AN: 152084Hom.: 16803 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.402 AC XY: 29871AN XY: 74350 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at