1-209615358-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000228.3(LAMB3):​c.3432A>G​(p.Ser1144Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.379 in 1,612,508 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 118,694 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.44 ( 15536 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.37 ( 103158 hom. )

Consequence

LAMB3
NM_000228.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.67

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LAMB3 (HGNC:6490): (laminin subunit beta 3) The product encoded by this gene is a laminin that belongs to a family of basement membrane proteins. This protein is a beta subunit laminin, which together with an alpha and a gamma subunit, forms laminin-5. Mutations in this gene cause epidermolysis bullosa junctional Herlitz type, and generalized atrophic benign epidermolysis bullosa, diseases that are characterized by blistering of the skin. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants that encode the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
LAMB3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • junctional epidermolysis bullosa
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health
  • junctional epidermolysis bullosa Herlitz type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
  • junctional epidermolysis bullosa, non-Herlitz type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • amelogenesis imperfecta type 1A
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • amelogenesis imperfecta type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • generalized junctional epidermolysis bullosa non-Herlitz type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 1-209615358-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-209615358-T-C is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 255595.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.67 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.604 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LAMB3NM_000228.3 linkc.3432A>G p.Ser1144Ser synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 23 ENST00000356082.9 NP_000219.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LAMB3ENST00000356082.9 linkc.3432A>G p.Ser1144Ser synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 23 1 NM_000228.3 ENSP00000348384.3
LAMB3ENST00000367030.7 linkc.3432A>G p.Ser1144Ser synonymous_variant Exon 23 of 23 1 ENSP00000355997.3
LAMB3ENST00000391911.5 linkc.3432A>G p.Ser1144Ser synonymous_variant Exon 22 of 22 1 ENSP00000375778.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.438
AC:
66644
AN:
151998
Hom.:
15520
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.611
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.284
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.389
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.407
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.409
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.408
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.404
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.259
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.360
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.417
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.394
AC:
98338
AN:
249352
AF XY:
0.390
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.619
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.377
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.430
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.416
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.390
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.361
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.375
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.373
AC:
544006
AN:
1460392
Hom.:
103158
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
0.373
AC XY:
270932
AN XY:
726446
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.618
AC:
20656
AN:
33430
American (AMR)
AF:
0.376
AC:
16811
AN:
44664
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.421
AC:
10988
AN:
26094
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.415
AC:
16439
AN:
39634
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.401
AC:
34580
AN:
86134
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.386
AC:
20527
AN:
53130
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.338
AC:
1945
AN:
5758
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.359
AC:
399004
AN:
1111198
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.382
AC:
23056
AN:
60350
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.486
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
18296
36591
54887
73182
91478
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
12824
25648
38472
51296
64120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.439
AC:
66704
AN:
152116
Hom.:
15536
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.437
AC XY:
32518
AN XY:
74374
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.611
AC:
25334
AN:
41484
American (AMR)
AF:
0.389
AC:
5945
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.407
AC:
1413
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.408
AC:
2110
AN:
5166
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.407
AC:
1962
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.404
AC:
4279
AN:
10586
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.265
AC:
78
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.360
AC:
24437
AN:
67972
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.419
AC:
887
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1864
3728
5592
7456
9320
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
600
1200
1800
2400
3000
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.391
Hom.:
11628
Bravo
AF:
0.443
Asia WGS
AF:
0.406
AC:
1416
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not specified Benign:1
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa, non-Herlitz type Benign:1
Jul 08, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Amelogenesis imperfecta type 1A Benign:1
Jul 08, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa gravis of Herlitz Benign:1
Jul 08, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.035
DANN
Benign
0.59
PhyloP100
-4.7
Mutation Taster
=97/3
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1049607; hg19: chr1-209788703; COSMIC: COSV50520600; COSMIC: COSV50520600; API