1-209789693-A-G
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1
The NM_006147.4(IRF6):āc.1153T>Cā(p.Leu385=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0041 in 1,613,494 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 188 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.019 ( 83 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š: 0.0025 ( 105 hom. )
Consequence
IRF6
NM_006147.4 synonymous
NM_006147.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.438
Genes affected
IRF6 (HGNC:6121): (interferon regulatory factor 6) This gene encodes a member of the interferon regulatory transcription factor (IRF) family. Family members share a highly-conserved N-terminal helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain and a less conserved C-terminal protein-binding domain. The encoded protein may be a transcriptional activator. Mutations in this gene can cause van der Woude syndrome and popliteal pterygium syndrome. Mutations in this gene are also associated with non-syndromic orofacial cleft type 6. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, May 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 1-209789693-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-209789693-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 259922.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.438 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0638 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRF6 | NM_006147.4 | c.1153T>C | p.Leu385= | synonymous_variant | 8/9 | ENST00000367021.8 | NP_006138.1 | |
IRF6 | NM_001206696.2 | c.868T>C | p.Leu290= | synonymous_variant | 6/7 | NP_001193625.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRF6 | ENST00000367021.8 | c.1153T>C | p.Leu385= | synonymous_variant | 8/9 | 1 | NM_006147.4 | ENSP00000355988 | P1 | |
IRF6 | ENST00000542854.5 | c.868T>C | p.Leu290= | synonymous_variant | 6/7 | 2 | ENSP00000440532 | |||
IRF6 | ENST00000643798.1 | c.*663T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 8/9 | ENSP00000496669 | |||||
IRF6 | ENST00000696134.1 | c.*580T>C | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 8/9 | ENSP00000512427 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0193 AC: 2936AN: 152130Hom.: 83 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
2936
AN:
152130
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00568 AC: 1429AN: 251484Hom.: 48 AF XY: 0.00434 AC XY: 590AN XY: 135916
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1429
AN:
251484
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
590
AN XY:
135916
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00251 AC: 3674AN: 1461246Hom.: 105 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00231 AC XY: 1681AN XY: 726990
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
3674
AN:
1461246
Hom.:
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
AC XY:
1681
AN XY:
726990
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0193 AC: 2945AN: 152248Hom.: 83 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0190 AC XY: 1412AN XY: 74438
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
2945
AN:
152248
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
1412
AN XY:
74438
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
9
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Van der Woude syndrome;C0265259:Popliteal pterygium syndrome;C1837213:Orofacial cleft 6, susceptibility to Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Orofacial cleft 6, susceptibility to Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Van der Woude syndrome 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at