1-209795339-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBP7BS2
The NM_006147.4(IRF6):c.459G>A(p.Ser153Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000015 in 1,461,852 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. S153S) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006147.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- autosomal dominant popliteal pterygium syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- IRF6-related conditionInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- van der Woude syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
- popliteal pterygium syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- tooth agenesisInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- van der Woude syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- orofacial cleft 6, susceptibility toInheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000159 AC: 4AN: 251410 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000150 AC: 22AN: 1461852Hom.: 0 Cov.: 48 AF XY: 0.0000220 AC XY: 16AN XY: 727220 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at