1-215838019-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_206933.4(USH2A):c.9343A>G(p.Thr3115Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0478 in 1,613,802 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2,531 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_206933.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USH2A | ENST00000307340.8 | c.9343A>G | p.Thr3115Ala | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 72 | 1 | NM_206933.4 | ENSP00000305941.3 | ||
USH2A | ENST00000674083.1 | c.9343A>G | p.Thr3115Ala | missense_variant | Exon 47 of 73 | ENSP00000501296.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0361 AC: 5492AN: 152178Hom.: 169 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0497 AC: 12498AN: 251308Hom.: 550 AF XY: 0.0504 AC XY: 6839AN XY: 135814
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0490 AC: 71657AN: 1461506Hom.: 2363 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0496 AC XY: 36036AN XY: 727078
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0360 AC: 5486AN: 152296Hom.: 168 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0364 AC XY: 2714AN XY: 74468
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:2Other:1
- -
- -
- -
Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:2
- -
- -
Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at