1-215999038-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_206933.4(USH2A):​c.6506T>C​(p.Ile2169Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.518 in 1,609,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 220,928 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.51 ( 20321 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.52 ( 200607 hom. )

Consequence

USH2A
NM_206933.4 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:15

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.37

Publications

52 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
USH2A (HGNC:12601): (usherin) This gene encodes a protein that contains laminin EGF motifs, a pentaxin domain, and many fibronectin type III motifs. The protein is found in the basement membrane, and may be important in development and homeostasis of the inner ear and retina. Mutations within this gene have been associated with Usher syndrome type IIa and retinitis pigmentosa. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]
USH2A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Usher syndrome type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Usher syndrome type 2A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa 39
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • retinitis pigmentosa
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=1.5664968E-6).
BP6
Variant 1-215999038-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-215999038-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 48562.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.822 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
USH2ANM_206933.4 linkc.6506T>C p.Ile2169Thr missense_variant Exon 34 of 72 ENST00000307340.8 NP_996816.3 O75445-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
USH2AENST00000307340.8 linkc.6506T>C p.Ile2169Thr missense_variant Exon 34 of 72 1 NM_206933.4 ENSP00000305941.3 O75445-1
USH2AENST00000674083.1 linkc.6506T>C p.Ile2169Thr missense_variant Exon 34 of 73 ENSP00000501296.1 O75445-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.510
AC:
77324
AN:
151720
Hom.:
20294
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.430
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.684
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.558
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.500
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.842
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.612
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.582
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.510
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.502
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.509
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.563
AC:
140654
AN:
249906
AF XY:
0.558
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.433
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.670
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.490
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.841
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.572
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.500
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.539
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.518
AC:
755422
AN:
1457174
Hom.:
200607
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.520
AC XY:
377298
AN XY:
725068
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.432
AC:
14410
AN:
33334
American (AMR)
AF:
0.664
AC:
29581
AN:
44560
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.496
AC:
12913
AN:
26052
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.865
AC:
34241
AN:
39564
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.595
AC:
51173
AN:
85970
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.568
AC:
30309
AN:
53336
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.509
AC:
2902
AN:
5706
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.495
AC:
548408
AN:
1108454
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.523
AC:
31485
AN:
60198
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.463
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16338
32677
49015
65354
81692
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
16214
32428
48642
64856
81070
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.510
AC:
77394
AN:
151838
Hom.:
20321
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.518
AC XY:
38426
AN XY:
74234
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.430
AC:
17789
AN:
41398
American (AMR)
AF:
0.558
AC:
8503
AN:
15236
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.500
AC:
1737
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.843
AC:
4351
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.613
AC:
2955
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.582
AC:
6144
AN:
10552
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.521
AC:
152
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.502
AC:
34064
AN:
67894
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.511
AC:
1077
AN:
2106
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1906
3811
5717
7622
9528
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
682
1364
2046
2728
3410
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.504
Hom.:
68469
Bravo
AF:
0.511
TwinsUK
AF:
0.499
AC:
1849
ALSPAC
AF:
0.495
AC:
1906
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.438
AC:
1932
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.503
AC:
4323
ExAC
AF:
0.556
AC:
67525
Asia WGS
AF:
0.699
AC:
2430
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.496
EpiControl
AF:
0.493

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:15
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:8
Jun 26, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 19, 2008
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 22, 2013
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Apr 10, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 29, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Usher syndrome type 2A Benign:3
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 28, 2019
Mendelics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Retinal dystrophy Benign:1
Oct 01, 2023
Dept Of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.68
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.057
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.42
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.18
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.92
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.64
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0000016
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.90
L
PhyloP100
2.4
PrimateAI
Benign
0.36
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.3
N
REVEL
Benign
0.11
Sift
Benign
0.24
T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.054
T
Polyphen
0.094
B
Vest4
0.056
MPC
0.037
ClinPred
0.017
T
GERP RS
5.8
Varity_R
0.10
gMVP
0.20
Mutation Taster
=95/5
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs10864219; hg19: chr1-216172380; COSMIC: COSV56370398; API